Profhilo is a brand of stabilised hyaluronic acid injected at a small number of set points to improve skin hydration, firmness and quality. It is not designed to add volume or change shape. It is usually given as two sessions four weeks apart, with results developing over the following weeks.
| Classification | Medical device. Hyaluronic acid, stabilised without conventional chemical cross-linking |
|---|---|
| Purpose | Skin quality, hydration and firmness. Not volume and not contour |
| Protocol | Two sessions, four weeks apart, then maintenance |
| Technique | A small number of defined injection points per side, then the product spreads |
| Areas | Face, neck, décolletage, hands, inner arms |
| Result | Develops over weeks. Assessed at around eight weeks from the first session |
| Duration | Commonly around six months before maintenance |
Conventional dermal fillers are cross-linked so that they resist breakdown and hold a shape. Products in this category are stabilised differently, so that instead of staying where they are placed they spread through the tissue plane. The intention is not to occupy space but to hydrate the tissue and to stimulate the cells that produce collagen and elastin.
That difference explains everything about how the treatment behaves. It is injected at a handful of points rather than shaped by hand. It produces no immediate change in contour. And the result, when it comes, is a change in the quality and light of the skin rather than in its shape.
It is closer to a skin treatment delivered by needle than to a filler.
It suits less well:
This page names a brand because the treatment is widely known by it and because the product is a medical device rather than a prescription-only medicine, so the advertising restrictions that apply to botulinum toxin do not apply here. Several comparable products exist. Ask what is being used and why.
The standard approach is two treatments four weeks apart. That interval is part of the protocol rather than a scheduling convenience, and skipping the second session generally means an underwhelming result.
Product is placed at a small number of defined points chosen to sit away from significant vessels and to allow even spread. Each point produces a small raised bleb which settles within hours. The technique is standardised, which is unusual in this field, but the assessment of whether you are a candidate is not.
The change is real and it is subtle. Skin looks better hydrated, reflects light more evenly, and feels firmer. Fine crepiness improves. People often report that others notice they look well without identifying why.
What does not happen: contour does not change, folds do not disappear, and skin that is genuinely lax does not tighten. Photographs promising dramatic lifting from this category of treatment should be treated with scepticism, and the treatment judged on what it is actually designed to do.
Standard aftercare: no make-up on the points for the rest of the day, no strenuous exercise, sauna or steam for around twenty four hours, no facials or massage over the area for two weeks, and do not press or massage the blebs. See the aftercare page.
This category works well alongside treatments that address different findings. Muscle treatment addresses movement, structural filler addresses lost support, resurfacing addresses surface texture, and bio-remodelling addresses hydration and quality. They are complementary rather than alternatives.
Sensible sequencing avoids doing everything in one appointment. Convention is to allow around two weeks between this and botulinum toxin or resurfacing in the same area, mostly so that any reaction can be attributed to the right treatment.
See skin boosters and polynucleotides for the neighbouring options, which are often confused with this one.
This is a treatment whose result is genuinely difficult to see in a mirror, because the change is gradual and because you look at your own face every day. Without a reference point, most people conclude either that nothing happened or that everything did, depending on what they expected.
The reference point is a photograph taken under conditions you can repeat: the same room, the same time of day, the same light source in the same position, the same distance, no make-up, and a neutral expression. Take one before the first session and another at around eight weeks after it. That comparison is worth more than any number of clinic images.
What you are looking for is not a change in shape. It is how evenly the skin reflects light, how fine crepiness reads at the cheek and under the eye, and how the skin looks late in the day rather than first thing in the morning. If none of that has changed by eight weeks, the treatment has not worked for you, and the correct response is a conversation about whether your concern was ever a skin quality problem rather than a booking for a third session.
Not in the usual sense. It is designed to spread through tissue and improve skin quality rather than to stay in place and create shape.
The standard protocol is two, four weeks apart, then maintenance at around six months.
Gradually, with the meaningful change usually assessed around eight weeks after the first session.
No. It improves skin quality and firmness. Significant laxity needs a different treatment.
Yes, and the neck is one of the areas where it is most useful, because resurfacing there carries more risk and heals more slowly.
A small number of injection points, each briefly stinging. Most people find it very tolerable and no numbing is usually needed.
It is hyaluronic acid, so hyaluronidase can be used, though this is rarely necessary because the product is not creating shape.
Treatment
Hydration delivered into the skin rather than onto it. A course, not an appointment.
Read
Treatment
A newer category with real promise and marketing that has already outrun the evidence.
Read
Treatment
A medical device, not a medicine. That single fact explains most of what is wrong with the market.
ReadThis website sells nothing and books nothing. It exists so that you walk into a consultation already knowing which questions separate a careful practitioner from a confident one, and already knowing when the correct answer is to leave without treatment.
hello@aestheticlaunchlab.comEnquiries are read and answered by Aesthetic Launch Lab, the UK aesthetics digital specialist that operates this website. Please do not send clinical details or photographs. If something has gone wrong after a procedure, contact the practitioner who treated you, or NHS 111, rather than waiting for a reply here.